[tor-talk] Decoding Jake Appelbaum

[Cecilia Tanaka]

Err...  It was pretty embarrassing and strange...  :-/

Sorry for asking, Mattia...  Do you know that I hate FBI with all my forces
or not?  O.o

Please, you can say everything about me, but do *NOT* say that I support
FBI in any sense.  It is really, really offensive for me.

I hate governments, I admiss, but I never said I am an anarchist and my
work is using laws...  :P

On Jun 7, 2016 5:45 PM, "Mattia" <sowdust at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Anarchists, you say. Anarchy shall be possible when people are tough
enough
> to respond to violence, and kind enough not to make any violence that
can't
> be defended.
>
> What these "anarchists" are doing is to not be tough enough to face their
> actions, and being so violent that the offended person will never be able
> to defend himself.
>
> Utopia of anarchism is not a world with no laws. Is a world where rules
are
> naturally followed without being enforced.
> And the right to defend oneself after accusations and have a fair trial is
> a right that is enforced by law in most of those governments that you,
> self-called-anarchists, think are so much better of.
>
> Was this FBI? Are these accusations real? (I have not seen any accusation
> of RAPE, which is profoundly different than having a disturbing behaviour,
> although many titles use that word).
> It matters up to a certain point. Responses are what concerned me.
>
> People claiming "we don't need proofs, just one accusation of rape is
> enough"... what world do you live in? There's something beyond your
> computer screen and your world made of bits. And in that world, one, 100,
> 10000 anonymous accusations are not enough to destroy a person.
>
> And if this were FBI - well you just made them the huge favour of proving
> the necessity of their existance.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:08 PM, df. <df at riseup.net> wrote:
>
> >
> > Cecilia Tanaka:
> >
> > > I received some cruel messages in different accounts.  I will stalk
> > > my stalkers later, don't worry.  It is not about revenge, just
> > > "educational purposes", I swear!  :)
> >
> > I am very sad to hear that Cecilia. Let "educational purposes" be karma.
> >
> > >
> > > Now I am more worried about Jake.  If the messages sent for me were
> > > cruel, I can imagine the level of messages sent for Jake.
> >
> > I am sure there are too many to count.
> >
> > I guess for some people when they have no arguments they just resort
> > to unfounded verbal attacks.
> >
> > Saludos cordiales,
> >
> > df.