[tor-dev] Comparing Stem, metrics-lib, and zoossh

[Karsten Loesing]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 12/01/16 17:19, Damian Johnson wrote:
> Thanks! Yup, those results look reasonable. I was expecting a
> smaller delta with server/extrainfo descriptors and larger one
> with microdescriptors due to the lazy loading but oh well. What
> stem commit and python version was this with?

This was Stem commit c01a9cda4e7699c7f4bd642c8e81ed45aab7a29b and
Python version 2.7.10.

> Any thoughts on when you'll have time to clean up the metrics-lib 
> examples? Happy to add the results to our site when they're ready.

Or should we add these performance tests for metrics-lib, Stem, and
Zoossh to their own repository that also comes with scripts to fetch
data from CollecTor?  (Not sure if this is a smart thing to do, but I
figured I should ask before adding things to the metrics-lib repository.)

All the best,
Karsten
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWlpnzAAoJEJD5dJfVqbCrn60IAMQy2RJR4eN66en8wDnOjPNZ
c3xjQfcZg2vTYtUO9f5Uj4Hx4PYbodGxnS6m4r6+xtAnT1PpPzMc7O8bbEJNhAWD
1a9gVUvy4OYPYXsCGY9KlyIbmwCgSyXRj+Kb4C0Levd7xQ7C6Yvku6nWw3OZlJz8
K5t4TKPrU5ScovlxOfKTijytvNKfX16vO0vjC1w+WN5oex4UbGLRbtHLQlf3ZOmz
hlvzWrSd7SdTNMEEpG01iZ8HxqEQLCapbWYg32KzheXW8W1NBTBm0abh1F4jGZbX
UYKKBg5+E2/sxPfvyCACkRnP1ulfENSyt8kvD2qFquxp/cwuHuZC0XtCkKARSII=
=YX00
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----