[tor-dev] Proposal 264: Putting version numbers on the Tor subprotocols

[Tim Wilson-Brown - teor]

> On 7 Jan 2016, at 10:14, Nick Mathewson <nickm at torproject.org> wrote:
> 
>   We shouldn't add protocols for features where others can remain
>   oblivious to their presence or absence.  For example, if some
>   directory caches start supporting a new header, and clients can
>   safely send that header without knowing whether the directory cache
>   will understand it, then a new protocol version is not required.
> 
>   Because all relays currently on the network are 0.2.4.19 or later, we
>   can require 0.2.4.19, and use 0.2.4.19 as the minimal version so we
>   we don't need to do code archeology to determine which number

You did that thing where you start a sentence

Otherwise looks good, modulo a few typos that don't affect meaning.

Tim

Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP 968F094B

teor at blah dot im
OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/attachments/20160108/f56a8cb6/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/attachments/20160108/f56a8cb6/attachment.sig>