[tor-dev] Globe needs a new maintainer (was: maintenance status of atlas or globe)

[zaki at manian.org]

It looks like Atlas is essentially a static application where everything
runs client side.

Globe has a has a node.js backend. Is there any actually need for state to
persist within the application?

Atlas looks like a cleaner system in many ways.



On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:40 AM, isis <isis at torproject.org> wrote:

> Abhiram Chintangal transcribed 4.6K bytes:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Sounds interesting. Is it any different from Atlas? It looks like both of
> > them are similar in functionality.
> >
>
> They are roughly the same in features.  Originally, only Globe allowed
> people
> to look up bridge relays, both by fingerprint, hashed, and double hashed
> fingerprint, but Atlas now has those features as well.  IMO, Atlas is has
> better aesthetics, although perhaps it could use more interactivity on its
> charts.  Essentially, they are the same.
>
> Perhaps you have a good point?  Should we be focusing efforts on either
> Atlas
> or Globe, rather than both?
>
> --
>  ♥Ⓐ isis agora lovecruft
> _________________________________________________________
> OpenPGP: 4096R/0A6A58A14B5946ABDE18E207A3ADB67A2CDB8B35
> Current Keys: https://blog.patternsinthevoid.net/isis.txt
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-dev mailing list
> tor-dev at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/attachments/20150330/63f5e24f/attachment.html>