[tor-dev] Fwd: [DNSOP] [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00

[Wendy Seltzer]

Hi hellekin,

On 07/18/2015 12:22 PM, hellekin wrote:
> Dear Tor developers,
> 
> would it be possible to add https://torproject.org/spec page,

We have https://www.torproject.org/docs/documentation.html.en#DesignDoc
which points to

https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tree/tor-spec.txt
https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tree/rend-spec.txt
etc.

Do you think we need a new and different page?

--Wendy


 including
> anchors for the various specifications: #tor-protocol, #tor-rendezvous,
> etc. pointing to the repository, to accommodate the General Area Review
> Team's comments, enable future stable reference to Tor specs, and move
> on?
> 
> That would be very, very simple to implement, and very, very useful as a
> temporary fix since I don't see the Tor project nor the IETF releasing
> Tor specs RFCs before the CAB forum's deadline is reached within four
> months.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> ==
> hk
> 
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: [DNSOP] [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00
> Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 05:25:25 -0400
> From: Joel M. Halpern <jmh at joelhalpern.com>
> To: A. Jean Mahoney <mahoney at nostrum.com>, General Area Review Team
> <gen-art at ietf.org>, dnsop at ietf.org
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00
>     The .onion Special-Use Domain Name
> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
> Review Date: 18-July-2015
> IETF LC End Date: 11-August-2015
> IESG Telechat date: N/A
> 
> Summary: This document is nearly ready for publication as a Proposed
> Standard RFC
> 
> Major issues: It seems to this reviewer that at least the definition of
> how to use these names, reference tor-rendezvous, needs to be a
> normative reference.  It appears likely that tor-address also ought to
> be a normative reference.
> 
> Minor issues:  It is not clear that a github reference without version
> identification is sufficiently stable for a normative reference from an
> RFC.
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tor-dev mailing list
> tor-dev at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
> 


-- 
Wendy Seltzer -- wendy at seltzer.org +1 617.863.0613
Policy Counsel, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
Visiting Fellow, Yale Law School Information Society Project
http://wendy.seltzer.org/
https://www.chillingeffects.org/
https://www.torproject.org/
http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/