[tor-dev] Fwd: [DNSOP] [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00

[hellekin]

Dear Tor developers,

would it be possible to add https://torproject.org/spec page, including
anchors for the various specifications: #tor-protocol, #tor-rendezvous,
etc. pointing to the repository, to accommodate the General Area Review
Team's comments, enable future stable reference to Tor specs, and move
on?

That would be very, very simple to implement, and very, very useful as a
temporary fix since I don't see the Tor project nor the IETF releasing
Tor specs RFCs before the CAB forum's deadline is reached within four
months.

Thank you,

==
hk


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [DNSOP] [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 05:25:25 -0400
From: Joel M. Halpern <jmh at joelhalpern.com>
To: A. Jean Mahoney <mahoney at nostrum.com>, General Area Review Team
<gen-art at ietf.org>, dnsop at ietf.org

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00
    The .onion Special-Use Domain Name
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review Date: 18-July-2015
IETF LC End Date: 11-August-2015
IESG Telechat date: N/A

Summary: This document is nearly ready for publication as a Proposed
Standard RFC

Major issues: It seems to this reviewer that at least the definition of
how to use these names, reference tor-rendezvous, needs to be a
normative reference.  It appears likely that tor-address also ought to
be a normative reference.

Minor issues:  It is not clear that a github reference without version
identification is sufficiently stable for a normative reference from an
RFC.

Nits/editorial comments:

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop