Proposal 105 (handshake revision) needs more thought

[Roger Dingledine]

On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 07:11:53PM -0400, Watson Ladd wrote:
> > http://tor.eff.org/svn/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/105-handshake-revision.txt
> Won't the use of a VERSION cell prevent the use of a low-latency
> protocol since we will be waiting for the VERSION cell before going
> forwards with the handshake?

What the heck is a "low-latency protocol"?

Also, notice that this is the TLS handshake we're talking about here.
Not the circuit handshake.

--Roger