Proposal 105 (handshake revision) needs more thought

[Watson Ladd]

Roger Dingledine wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> Proposal 105 looks like a nice start. For those of you who haven't
> already read it, go look at
> http://tor.eff.org/svn/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/105-handshake-revision.txt
> 
> I've got a few questions/comments, based on trying to write the
> "Advertising versions in routerdescs and networkstatuses" section.
Won't the use of a VERSION cell prevent the use of a low-latency
protocol since we will be waiting for the VERSION cell before going
forwards with the handshake?
---
Watson Ladd

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 249 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/attachments/20070311/37793bd8/attachment.pgp>