[tor-bugs] #29754 [Core Tor/Tor]: Include new monitoring KeyValues in the bandwidth-file-spec
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
blackhole at torproject.org
Wed Mar 27 23:27:54 UTC 2019
#29754: Include new monitoring KeyValues in the bandwidth-file-spec
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: juga | Owner: teor
Type: defect | Status:
| needs_revision
Priority: Medium | Milestone: Tor:
| 0.4.1.x-final
Component: Core Tor/Tor | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: tor-spec, bandwidth-file-spec, tor- | Actual Points:
bwauth |
Parent ID: #28547 | Points: 1
Reviewer: teor, juga | Sponsor:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by teor):
Replying to [comment:17 juga]:
> Replying to [comment:16 teor]:
> > Replying to [comment:10 juga]:
> > > I created https://github.com/teor2345/torspec/pull/1 against your PR
68, fixing some of the things i commented in the review, but not all.
> >
> > I reviewed your pull request.
> > Most of the commits are good, but we can't wrap example bandwidth file
lines.
>
> ok, i did it cause i was getting lost myself in such long lines, but
i've removed the new lines now.
> If a parser uses the Values exactly as they're in the examples, the
headers don't match with the lines. Maybe i could just put them in
different subsections so that it is a bit more clear that they don't
match?.
We can't split the header and the relay lines into different subsections,
because parsers need to be able to parse the whole file.
> If i change the number in the header to match the lines, then it would
not be that realistic.
Parsers should still work if the numbers in the header and relay lines do
not match.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/29754#comment:18>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
More information about the tor-bugs
mailing list