[tor-bugs] #16276 [Onionoo]: bug in onionoo's family set detection
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
blackhole at torproject.org
Mon Jun 15 19:06:21 UTC 2015
#16276: bug in onionoo's family set detection
-----------------------------+-----------------
Reporter: cypherpunks | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Onionoo | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
Actual Points: | Parent ID:
Points: |
-----------------------------+-----------------
Comment (by leeroy):
I didn't say they were better. You said you want to avoid redundancy. I
merely point out that both a family and effective_family is a
contradiction of your stated objectives. I'm just trying to make the
implementation concrete before trying to write any code.
Detecting misconfiguration can be done with the current system. Ask for
query by family, then ask for details document for one relay that was
returned a member of the set. Done. You say you would prefer lack of
redundancy, the ability to detect misconfiguration, retaining backwards
compatibility. So I'm trying to understand how family and effective_family
is better than the current implementation. If Onionoo isn't a service used
by humans, then why change it at all in this case.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/16276#comment:22>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
More information about the tor-bugs
mailing list