[tor-talk] Neal Krawetz's abcission proposal, and Tor's reputation

[Alec Muffett]

On 30 August 2017 at 15:07, Ben Tasker <ben at bentasker.co.uk> wrote:

> That's not quite the claim he's making though. He seems to be claiming any
> "legitimate" (in his eyes) service shouldn't mind sacrificing their own
> anonymity by being linked to a clearnet identity and becoming a "verified"
> onion to avoid the rolling rotation.



In other words: you have to pay-to-play in order to have security; pay for
a DNS domain, be subject to takedown and
spoofing-between-the-onion-verifier-and-the-attribution-site, and
deanonymisation / doxxing / throttling / regulation / imprisonment via
blocking payments to your hosting or DNS provider.

To slave onionspace to the clearnet, in other words.

    - alec



-- 
http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/aboutalecm