[tor-talk] [OFF-LIST] Re: Has anyone HEARD from IOError since his last tweet?

[notfriendly at riseup.net]

On 2016-06-05 19:41, Anthony Papillion wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
> 
> On 6/5/2016 6:35 PM, notfriendly at riseup.net wrote:
>> On 2016-06-05 19:30, Mirimir wrote:
>>> On 06/05/2016 05:14 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote:
>>>> On 6/5/2016 5:43 PM, notfriendly at riseup.net wrote:
>>>>> On 2016-06-05 18:17, Anthony Papillion wrote: The last time
>>>>> IOError tweeted was on 30 May. Has anyone on this list
>>>>> actually HEARD from him since then? We have to remember that
>>>>> Jake comes from a really fucked up childhood. Something like
>>>>> these allegations could push someone over the edge.
>>>> 
>>>>> Anthony
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> He might need time to himself for now. He has a lot of
>>>>> people talking about him right now. He probably needs a
>>>>> break.
>>>> 
>>>> You're probably right. I've just seen this kind of thing get
>>>> out of hand before and, innocent or not, people can be pushed
>>>> over the edge.
>>> 
>>> I get where you're coming from, but public comments about his
>>> history, and speculation about suicide, really aren't
>>> appropriate. IMHO, anyway.
>>> 
>>> Just sayin'.
>> I agree with that. We shouldn't assume someone died just because
>> they are not responding to online communications. The speculation
>> is suicide as you said is indefinably inappropriate. He might need
>> a break. Another possibility is that he is in an area with a power
>> or internet outage (I'm not sure why long term but still). These
>> are all possibilities.
> 
> I'm pretty sure I never said he had suicided so there's no
> 'assumption' there. What I did say is that, in light of the stress
> he's under, someone should at least check on him. I mean yes there are
> other possibilities but nothing should be flippantly ruled out. At
> what point is it 'appropriate' to be concerned? A month? A year?
> Never? If we never hear from him again should we simply assume he's
> alright and just decided to check out of the community? I guess we're
> all allowed our opinions but I choose to err on the side of concern
> for a fellow human being who's directly impacted my life. Your choices
> might be different.
> 
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXVLiwAAoJEAKK33RTsEsV+gkP/RFuj5jFnglZ/FAAsmrZPjqR
> oqDoWbr8axbhw1m7TkI1uGN+YGgLLuK+VsSCtPlQn+J9KN8pj38SvpVzIPA/1Dke
> snPdyA59BkE95oN5dkRmzuDT0y9yujgKXOBn/h33pfyRV259lGseJLDzf6y5IcCq
> 7pSWeoDEBnWqt0LjdLODOQrRCti1Vdiu32tNf5vUQRgX4r1bNvMUPu/xTDcR6/K9
> m2zf56ejIgDuiu6wXb1Hu+9Vi5p27UWibt4NvExpxBTCbF9ajbpI4EZtKQi81R1B
> JzsNHQS5O2Mg9daCuOYgf0pLXbuhozDeXdoH4mmwTZvkOqoBv843hJl8SrXnZZPK
> B6i7kQ0wx0dTMUpbacN3oNLYSaBDdXgDe3HqxRBqWXhTcCEMP0LMzQJ8TEljuYOv
> 6c3ZMnrOh6hMm1h5ScWSK/MGTil7392PPzt8/MdGWTjwGTq2X+KXhIjfsT6qQ9rz
> fg/QgBBNaRFCYLKzEWV+k9JHU8SyFEoI5VK89W39K+sZeemFmTcyOwTFnGPyeBIi
> mO7udvZiFyeBoc0r4mYAMh16mcP1JycaG5WSYvA5KlwuUqVWljpyXHp4ib3Og28B
> z/cidAxOpaC9jBjZqvmqXbfi3dzzPWd7DWOKsI9k0BPMtWyUuReVutrDnbye/SOk
> tGeDevtxHSsxgibhq7MI
> =akKt
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

"I'm pretty sure I never said he had suicided so there's no
'assumption' there."

Ok sorry for making that error in my reading of your messages. I do 
however say that we should respect his privacy by not having people 
harass him at his apartment.