[tor-talk] Making TBB undetectable!
Spencer
spencerone at openmailbox.org
Mon Oct 5 09:14:11 UTC 2015
Hi,
>
> Ben Tasker:
> The problem you have there, is what to randomize,
>
The various bits that define your fingerprint.
>
> but natural's hard to fake
>
No need to spoof traffic if using real fingerprint variables.
>
> When we're talking about making the browser unidentifiable as TBB, the
> very
> act of having something in the fingerprint that changes to prevent
> correlation between sessions provides an avenue by which it can be
> identified as TBB:
>
I feel like behavior will address the examples for this argument.
>>
>> Spencer:
>> Making people blend into the crowd of regular internet users is best
>> but
>> only if we resolve the traffic source; i.e., Tor exits.
>>
>
> That's quite an issue to solve though. [Attackers can] map out Tor
> exits...
>
True, but we can come up with other ideas than using the public Tor
exits.
>
> the aim isn't to hide that you're using Tor
> from your destination, and successfully doing so would (IMO) be a
> pretty
> non-trivial task
>
But it is, and I agree :)
>
> Those are a list of the requests we know are differentiators, it
> doesn't
> mean that others won't be discovered, you'd need to gamble that
> anything
> found is publicly disclosed when it's found, rather than kept quiet by
> an
> adversary.
>
But this is the case for everybody everywhere.
>
> What you're essentially asking for is a browser that behaves
> like TBB (i.e. the various privacy protections) whilst pretending it
> behaves like a Google Nexus (for example). It's not that it'd be
> impossible
> to do, but one tiny mistake or oversight takes you straight back to
> being
> finger-printable, and almost uniquely so if very few are using
> Unidentifiable Mode.
>
With the fingerprint, isn't it only valuable over multiple sessions, and
if others aren't also using that same ID?
>
> So, you can fairly easily poll for various add-ons. Not sure it'd
> affect
> your add-on, but seemed worth mentioning.
>
I don't see this being an add-on as much as being in the settings
options (which can probably be detected?) where the User Agent is
located. The User Agent would be a nice way to simplify the various
IDs.
The IDs can be open-source and added to other browsers as a standard way
of providing detectability.
Wordlife,
Spencer
More information about the tor-talk
mailing list