[tor-talk] tor-talk Digest, Vol 51, Issue 39

[Rekha Tokas]

Can I get the list of those sites which ate blocking tor traffic to view or
edit their page.
On 23 Apr 2015 17:30, <tor-talk-request at lists.torproject.org> wrote:

> Send tor-talk mailing list submissions to
>         tor-talk at lists.torproject.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         tor-talk-request at lists.torproject.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         tor-talk-owner at lists.torproject.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of tor-talk digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: SIGAINT email service targeted by 70 bad exit nodes
>       (Aymeric Vitte)
>    2. Upcoming change to Firefox internals that hopefully shouldn't
>       break TBB (David Rajchenbach-Teller)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 13:02:14 +0200
> From: Aymeric Vitte <vitteaymeric at gmail.com>
> To: tor-talk at lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] SIGAINT email service targeted by 70 bad exit
>         nodes
> Message-ID: <5538D136.60008 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
>
>
>
> Le 23/04/2015 06:08, Roger Dingledine a ?crit :
> >> >I know we could SSL sigaint.org, but if it is a state-actor they
> could just
> >> >use one of their CAs and mill a key.
> > This is not great logic. You're running a website without SSL, even
> though
> > you know people are attacking you? Shouldn't your users be hassling you
> > to give them better options?:)
> >
> > As you say, SSL is not perfect, but it does raise the bar a lot. That
> > seems like the obvious next step for making your website safer for
> > your users.
> >
> Yes, you should use SSL/TLS and you and/or your users run the very
> excellent "interception detector" http://www.ianonym.com/intercept.html
>
> Of course to be maximally efficient the tool should be installed on your
> site and it should be modified not to change the proxy settings (and
> then be compatible with the Tor browser, which unfortunately is
> currently not the case), because if the mitm is not stupid it can see
> that the destination IP in the socks message does not match your domain.
>
> It can be tried with the secret "abcd" (abcd.sigaint.org)
>
> --
> Check the 10 M passwords list: http://peersm.com/findmyass
> Anti-spies and private torrents, dynamic blocklist:
> http://torrent-live.org
> Peersm : http://www.peersm.com
> torrent-live: https://github.com/Ayms/torrent-live
> node-Tor : https://www.github.com/Ayms/node-Tor
> GitHub : https://www.github.com/Ayms
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 13:51:44 +0200
> From: David Rajchenbach-Teller <dteller at mozilla.com>
> To: tor-talk at lists.torproject.org
> Subject: [tor-talk] Upcoming change to Firefox internals that
>         hopefully shouldn't break TBB
> Message-ID: <5538DCD0.1040200 at mozilla.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>     Hi everyone,
>
>  We are planning to land a change in Firefox that has a small chance of
> impacting TBB. The patch is here:
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1157235 .
>
> Now that Firefox handles internally the non-saving of private
> tabs/windows, we believe that this should have no impact. It would be
> great if someone working on TBB could confirm that we are not breaking
> anything.
>
> Cheers,
>  David/Yoric
>
> --
> David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD
>  Performance Team, Mozilla
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 473 bytes
> Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
> URL: <
> http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/attachments/20150423/5a5d34ae/attachment-0001.sig
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-talk mailing list
> tor-talk at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of tor-talk Digest, Vol 51, Issue 39
> ****************************************
>