[tor-talk] Isolating Proxy and iptables.

[Clare ♬]

I've just noticed that this is terribly formatted. Let me try to re-format my rules for easier reading (if this fails again, please do excuse me!). 

iptables -t nat -a PREROUTING -i $INT_IF -p udp --dport 53 -j REDIRECT --to-ports 53iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i $INT_IF -p tcp --syn -j REDIRECT --to-ports 9040
And the rules that I'm considering... 
iptables -P INPUT DROPiptables -P FORWARD DROPiptables -P OUTPUT DROP
iptables -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPTiptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPTiptables -A OUTPUT -o lo -j ACCEPTiptables -A OUTPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
Any help would be greatly appreciated. 

> From: clares_pad at live.co.uk
> To: tor-talk at lists.torproject.org
> Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 14:59:23 +0000
> Subject: [tor-talk] Isolating Proxy and iptables.
> 
> I'm setting up a Tor-based isolating proxy using the 'Anonymizing Middlebox' iptables rules specified here: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TransparentProxy
> i.e.
> iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i $INT_IF -p udp --dport 53 -j REDIRECT --to-ports 53iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i $INT_IF -p tcp --syn -j REDIRECT --to-ports 9040
> ...and the INPUT, OUTPUT and FORWARD chains are left at the default. Would there be any merit to also including the following rules?
> iptables -P INPUT DROPiptables -P FORWARD DROPiptables -P OUTPUT DROP
> iptables -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPTiptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
> iptables -A OUTPUT -o lo -j ACCEPTiptables -A OUTPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
> Or are they rendered unnecessary by my current setup?
> Are there any other firewall rules that I should consider in order to improve security and ensure that all traffic is torified?
> Many thanks. 		 	   		  
> -- 
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk at lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk