[tor-talk] Terminology: Deep v Dark Web

[Julie Chartier]

You are hard to follow. Dont get rid of me yet ok? I'm not ready to go,

Julie Chartier
On Jan 26, 2014 8:45 PM, "Katya Titov" <kattitov at yandex.com> wrote:

> Rick:
> > Why should you be stuck with anything? You're writing an important
> > piece for an important project: You know... the onion with the crown?
> > What you're writing may well become a source, a reference. You drive
> > the conversation. All the words are belong to you. :)
> >
> > In a very broad sense I'd suggest:
> >
> > 'Commercial' that is open to all (sort of) and is after whatever can
> > be monetized.
> >
> > 'Private' that is behind all those heavy-metal firewalls and exists
> > primarily in support of 'commercial'.
> >
> > 'Neutral' for those referred to as 'deep' or 'dark' and, like Tor,
> > seek to be common carriers:Identity is by choice, not by mandate. The
> > connotations of the word 'neutral' are benign. It also suggests 'net
> > neutrality' (original recipe... not KFCC's extra-crispy). Further,
> > 'Neutral Net' has a nice ring to it. Shorten that to 'NeuNet' and the
> > media might run with the concept. They love that stuff; it makes the
> > Pulitzer fairies run around in their heads.
>
> Thanks Rick, for the encouragement and the suggestions. I've added a
> few definitions ('Open Internet' to represent your 'Commercial', as well
> as a 'Private network'), but I've left the dark web as is ... not sure
> that 'Neutral' fits, but I will keep it in mind.
> --
> kat
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk at lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>