[tor-talk] Vidalia Log 404 msgs
nano
nanotek at bsdbox.co
Tue Jan 14 16:00:29 UTC 2014
On 15/01/2014 2:55 AM, eliaz wrote:
> Running a bridge relay with standalone Vidalia 0.2.21 and Tor 3.5:
> Occasionally I'm getting '[Warning] Received http status code 404 ("Not
> found") from server xxx' (for guard relays, I presume; see the log lines
> below.) These are immediately followed by normal log entries, and other
> checking shows the circuits working fine. Are these warnings important?
> What am I supposed to do about them?
> -
> --extracted from Vidalia Message Log:
> Jan 14 04:37:42.350 [Warning] Received http status code 404 ("Not
> found") from server '83.212.99.68:9010' while fetching
> "/tor/keys/fp-sk/14C131DFC5C6F93646BE72FA1401C02A8DF2E8B4-98CC82342DE8D298CF99D3F1A396475901E0D38E".
> Jan 14 04:47:53.388 [Warning] Received http status code 404 ("Not
> found") from server '83.212.99.68:9010' while fetching
> "/tor/keys/fp-sk/14C131DFC5C6F93646BE72FA1401C02A8DF2E8B4-98CC82342DE8D298CF99D3F1A396475901E0D38E".
> Jan 14 05:22:54.372 [Notice] Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 3 days 5:57
> hours, with 3 circuits open. I've sent 10.28 MB and received 79.27 MB.
>
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
> http://www.avast.com
>
See: [tor-relays] 404: /tor/keys/fp-sk/print-print not found
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] 404: /tor/keys/fp-sk/print-print not found
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 14:49:21 +0100
From: Linus Nordberg <linus at nordberg.se>
Reply-To: tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
To: tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
nano <nanotek at bsdbox.co> wrote
Sun, 12 Jan 2014 13:57:20 +1100:
| I haven't looked into this at all yet, thought I would share it here
| first. Both my exit relays [0] received these repeated warnings around
| the same time yesterday:
|
| timestamp [warn] Received http status code 404 ("Not found") from
| server 'server1IP:port' while fetching
|
"/tor/keys/fp-sk/A1B2C3D4E5F6G7H8I9J0K1L2M3N4O5P6Q7R8S9T0-A1B2C3D4E5F6G7H8I9J0K1L2M3N4O5P6Q7R8S9T0".
| timestamp [warn] Received http status code 404 ("Not found") from
| server 'server2IP:port' while fetching
|
"/tor/keys/fp-sk/A1B2C3D4E5F6G7H8I9J0K1L2M3N4O5P6Q7R8S9T0-A1B2C3D4E5F6G7H8I9J0K1L2M3N4O5P6Q7R8S9T0".
| timestamp [warn] Received http status code 404 ("Not found") from
| server 'server3IP:port' while fetching
|
"/tor/keys/fp-sk/A1B2C3D4E5F6G7H8I9J0K1L2M3N4O5P6Q7R8S9T0-A1B2C3D4E5F6G7H8I9J0K1L2M3N4O5P6Q7R8S9T0".
| timestamp [warn] Received http status code 404 ("Not found") from
| server 'server4IP:port' while fetching
|
"/tor/keys/fp-sk/A1B2C3D4E5F6G7H8I9J0K1L2M3N4O5P6Q7R8S9T0-A1B2C3D4E5F6G7H8I9J0K1L2M3N4O5P6Q7R8S9T0".
|
| Only one timestamp and serverIP was consistent on both relays. All
| fingerprints, however, were consistent on both. Hasn't appeared before
| or since. Anything to worry about? Thanks.
Thanks for reporting. This happens when directory authorities switch
signing keys and you shouldn't worry.
My guess is that your fingerprints read
ED03BB616EB2F60BEC80151114BB25CEF515B226-B59F6E99C575113650C99F1C425BA7B20A8C071D
which would be gabelmoo with a new signing key since 2014-01-11 16:26:31
(UTC).
It's actually a bit misleading that you replaced both fingerprints with
the same string. If they are indeed identical, there's something to
worry about.
You will see more of these in the near future as all directory
authorities are switching signing keys before schedule in order to
increase the key size. See
https://people.torproject.org/~linus/sign2048.html for the progress on
this. We hope to have moved all authority signing keys to 2048 bits
within a couple of weeks.
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
--
syn.bsdbox.co
More information about the tor-talk
mailing list