[tor-talk] Tragedy of the commons.

[Alex]

So do companies. Your ISP was apparently unhappy with the exit node you had 
and looked quite far for something to shut it off.
Feel free to change the former exit node to a relay.


Gesendet mit AquaMail für Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com


Am 24. Mai 2013 21:36:53 schrieb Chris Patti <cpatti at gmail.com>:
> I understood the legal implications.  See my above note about the abuse
> report from Linode.
>
> I'm not complaining, just noting that it's unfortunate that folks have to
> abuse things.
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Roman Mamedov <rm at romanrm.ru> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 24 May 2013 13:39:31 -0400
> > Chris Patti <cpatti at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I just had to shut my relay down because someone was using it to hijack
> > > someone else's Gmail account :\
> > >
> > > Dunno how I could get around this other than by blocking port 80, which
> > is
> > > kind of the point :)
> >
> > "The point" of what? -- and for the record, GMail Web interface uses HTTPS
> > (port 443), not 80.
> >
> > If you don't want to run a 80/443 exit node, then consider allowing a
> > number
> > of different ports except those, AFAIK exits are scarce enough that any
> > port
> > that is used by people for anything that you can allow, will get used.
> >
> > However if you run an Exit node without fully understanding legal and other
> > implications (and you seem to do just that), then by all means please
> > don't :)
> >
> > --
> > With respect,
> > Roman
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Christopher Patti - Geek At Large | GTalk: cpatti at gmail.com | AIM:
> chrisfeohpatti | P: (260) 54PATTI
> "Technology challenges art, art inspires technology." - John Lasseter,
> Pixar
> _______________________________________________
> tor-talk mailing list
> tor-talk at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk