[tor-talk] Request for "Tor, king of anonymity" graphic

[nano]

On 26/12/2013 8:51 PM, Lee wrote:
> On 12/25/13, nano <nanotek at bsdbox.co> wrote:
>> On 26/12/2013 7:46 AM, Mirimir wrote:
>>> On 12/25/2013 02:59 AM, nano wrote:
>>>> On 25/12/2013 8:11 PM, Lunar wrote:
>>>>> nanotek:
>>>>>> I really didn't get the "rape" vibe from the graphic at all.
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you describe what is in the graphic?
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you try to summarize its intended meaning?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sure. I shared my favoured interpretation earlier.
>>>>
>>>> Beyond that, I see Jefferson fucking Obama from behind (i.e. bucking of
>>>> ignominious attempts to erode our hard-earned constitutional
>>>> convention). It is very well done too. Picture perfect!
>>>
>>> Isn't it the NSA that's been doing most of the backdoor fucking?
>>
>> Indeed. The irony only adds to its appeal.
>>
>>>
>>> Tor is rather more like a chastity belt than a crown ;)
>>>
>>
>> Tor empowers citizens to royally fuck Orwellian tactical planning, such
>> as that which is implemented by the NSA.
>
> You should take another look at the docs - eg:
> https://svn.torproject.org/svn/torvm/trunk/doc/design.html
>
>     Indefensible Attacks
>        Tor Attacks
>          Attacks which Tor cannot defend against, like a global passive
> adversary or traffic confirmation attacks, are obviously outside the
> scope of even the most robust Tor implementation.
>
> Regards,
> Lee
>

There is no need. It has been read many times.

Not sure how your suggestion diminishes Tor's utility in circumventing 
Orwellian policies. Tor is an integral munition in the 
Constitution-defending arsenal; which would be much weaker without it.

-- 
syn.bsdbox.co