[tor-talk] Building Petnames with DNSSEC...?

[Nathan Freitas]

On 06/03/2012 09:30 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> That does indeed seem like a better idea. We'll need to use something
> like unbound anyway, so we can use TXT records all the same, I guess.

Why not use SRV records?

if this was the
_xmpp-client._tcp.foo.com. 82698 IN	SRV	10 0 5222 foo.com.
_xmpp-server._tcp.foo.com. 86400 IN	SRV	10 0 5269 foo.com.

_onion-service._tcp.foo.com. 86400 IN	SRV	10 0 8888 xxxx.onion

or even this might be a good way to advertise onion based xmpp services:

_xmpp-client-onion._tcp.foo.com. 86400 IN	SRV	10 0 5222 xxxx.onion.


+n