[tor-talk] on the topic of tor's weaknesses

[b.g. white]

>I'm confused. Did you mean that you can't get to the anonbib webpage?
>The link you gave is the same as the one given on the anonbib page.
>(I gave the anonbib location to point people at a place where they
>might see lots of related papers by others and also to give in one
>location citation two possible URLs to retrieve the paper, the one you
>gave plus the anonbib cached version. Both of these worked for me
>when I tried them a moment ago.)

Just tried it again and it is working for me now. Originally, I would get a
blank page (no 404, etc.). Don't know what was going on with that.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Paul Syverson <syverson at itd.nrl.navy.mil>wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:52:34AM +0000, b.g. white wrote:
> > >We did do a design that, if one had a scheme that was successful
> > >against a passive attacker, would resist an active attacker. Though
> > >providing provable guarantees against a class of active attacker, it
> > >is not ready for primetime. See "Preventing Active Timing Attacks in
> > >Low-Latency Anonymous Communication" at http://freehaven.net/anonbib/
> >
> > That link to the paper is dead (for me?). Here is a good one.
> > http://www.cs.yale.edu/homes/jf/FJS-PETS2010.pdf
> >
>
> I'm confused. Did you mean that you can't get to the anonbib webpage?
> The link you gave is the same as the one given on the anonbib page.
> (I gave the anonbib location to point people at a place where they
> might see lots of related papers by others and also to give in one
> location citation two possible URLs to retrieve the paper, the one you
> gave plus the anonbib cached version. Both of these worked for me
> when I tried them a moment ago.)
>
> HTH,
> Paul
> _______________________________________________
> tor-talk mailing list
> tor-talk at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>