[tor-talk] notice - newer ver available just after install latest TBB
Zaher F.
the_one_man_85 at hotmail.com
Wed Oct 12 20:43:23 UTC 2011
the same think happened for me...
after downloading the nwe version and running TBB
aurora come out with the same message of update...
THX
> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:50:20 -0500
> From: joebtfsplk at gmx.com
> To: tor-talk at lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] notice - newer ver available just after install latest TBB
>
> On 10/12/2011 10:05 AM, andrew at torproject.org wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:47:26AM -0500, joebtfsplk at gmx.com wrote 0.5K bytes in 11 lines about:
> > : Immediately after extracting / starting the "latest stable" TBB
> > : 2.2.33-2 (today) from
> > : https://www.torproject.org/download/download-easy.html.en, Aurora
> > : popped a msg saying a newer version was available.
> >
> > What time did you get the notice on check? The updated version file was
> > in place at 2011-10-12 12:53 GMT. Prior to that time, you may have hit a
> > false positive result.
>
> Well, I see the version (S) listed apparently did change just after I
> d/l it this morning, BUT...
>
> There are still diff ver #s listed in diff places as the "latest."
> Here, (dated * Sept.* 10, 2011 ???) it says the new ver is *Tor Browser
> Bundle (2.2.32-4) -
> https://blog.torproject.org/blog/new-tor-browser-bundles-6***
> **I don't know if the page url "... bundles-6" refers to ver of Firefox,
> but if so, shouldn't it be "bundles-7"?
>
> Follow that link - for Windows - & it says: /Version 2.2.33-3/. So,
> what is the latest TBB version?
>
> My apologies, but I've thought for a while that news about new releases
> for many Tor Project apps was a bit disorganized. I see diff things
> about releases, in diff places on the Tor site.
> This isn't a big deal - I just think it could be better organized. At
> times, sort of appears the right hand doesn't know what the left is
> doing. I understand developers are in a rush, but Tor is confusing
> enough for less savvy users w/o posting conflicting info. I don't
> consider myself (severely) "less savvy," but I know how they feel.
> *
>
>
> *
> _______________________________________________
> tor-talk mailing list
> tor-talk at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/attachments/20111012/800f735e/attachment.htm>
More information about the tor-talk
mailing list