[tor-talk] Iran cracks down on web dissident technology
Aplin, Justin M
jmaplin at ufl.edu
Mon Mar 21 03:15:27 UTC 2011
On 3/20/2011 11:04 PM, Edward Langenback wrote:
> Joe Btfsplk wrote:
>> On 3/20/2011 5:08 PM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
>> You've GOT to be kidding. Tell me that's a mistake. Tor Project,
>> dedicated to privacy& anonymity, takes $ from DoD& Sam? While the US
>> spies on it's citizens, unconstitutionally? That's rich.
>> Honestly, this enlightenment will make me reconsider ever using Tor for
>> anything I don't want sent directly to DC. It's like trusting car
>> magazines' reviews that get their advertising $ from car manufacturers.
>> There is no way the fed is going to give $ to any "privacy" organization
>> w/o wanting something (cough, back door) in return. Every ISP has been
>> forced into violating users' privacy. Why would Tor project, after
>> taking $ from Sam, be any different? OK users, go ahead& stick your
>> head in the sand.
>>
>> EVEN if it's not true, for me, Tor project has lost a good deal of its
>> credibility through its associations. Of course, no government would
>> ever lie& neither would a company (AT&T, Ford, Google, R.J. Reynolds...).
> If I'm not mistaken, not only has TOR had at least some government /
> DOD funding from the start, the original project was started by the
> military.
This is well-known, publicly-available, and frankly, *old* information.
Of course, Tor is in open-source project, so you're welcome to peruse
the source for any backdoors and compile it for yourself, just to be sure.
~Justin Aplin
More information about the tor-talk
mailing list