Is "gatereloaded" a Bad Exit?
Curious Kid
letsshareinformation at yahoo.com
Mon Jan 31 21:07:39 UTC 2011
----- Original Message ----
> From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell at gmail.com>
> To: or-talk at freehaven.net
> Sent: Mon, January 31, 2011 6:47:37 PM
> Subject: Re: Is "gatereloaded" a Bad Exit?
>
> There are legitimate reasons why tor supports an operator controlled
> exit policy, but no real suggestion has been made for a _legitimate_
> reason to allow 80 and block 443.
Is it possible that some people operate in a port-restricted environment or that
port 443 is throttled by some ISPs?
My real question concerns the scenario in which a user happens upon an exit that
blocks HTTPS and uses that exit to access a website that uses a combination of
HTTP and HTTPS. The HTTPS portion would be forced through a different exit, and
the server may be programmed to notice the difference and break by design.
For example, say you want to login somewhere, and the server notes that you
appear to be logging in from France. The HTTPS portion appears to come from the
United States. That disparity triggers an "I'm sorry..." message.
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo at torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
More information about the tor-talk
mailing list