Is "gatereloaded" a Bad Exit?

[Mike Perry]

Thus spake Mike Perry (mikeperry at fscked.org):

> Thus spake Gregory Maxwell (gmaxwell at gmail.com):
> > As far as that exit policy goes, the RFC1918 blocks might be there in
> > an ignorant attempt to trigger the exit flag for completely benign
> > reasons, though sniffing sounds more likely.
> 
> I agree. We already have scripts to detect this, we just have not yet
> decided to actually use them yet. I believe we should.
> 
> Currently, 5 nodes exit to *only* plaintext ports for web and email.
> There are about 50 others that exit to the plaintext versions for web
> or email. 
> 
> I believe we hould ban these 5 immediately, and consider banning the
> other 50 after issuing the appropriate announcements.

Sorry, the 5 are:

NOTICE[Sat Jan 29 20:56:43 2011]:Nodes allowing plaintext but not secure:
        ElzaTorServer=009E71AED2C5580E942AC1743D1C440C5B2C459E
        QuantumSevero=4BF2F90E6E1905E2FB4F371E471422150D722A93
        gatereloaded=550CC9724FA77C7F9260B93989D22A70654D3B92
        oompaloompa=775DF6B8CF3FB0150A594F6E2B5CB1E0AC45D09B
        oompaloompa2=BABBF0694251E5AFF7BF3A0A02EFDC12CB99B05F


-- 
Mike Perry
Mad Computer Scientist
fscked.org evil labs
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/attachments/20110129/21a881c3/attachment.pgp>