blutmagie TNS / v0.2.2.15 nodes
Olaf Selke
olaf.selke at blutmagie.de
Wed Aug 25 16:49:12 UTC 2010
Am 25.08.2010 12:35, schrieb Karsten Loesing:
>
> On 8/25/10 12:10 PM, Olaf Selke wrote:
>> blutmagie Tor network status site apparently displays incorrect
>> bandwidth values for all nodes running version 0.2.2.15. Unlike other
>> tns sites blutmagie calculated bw as an average from the extra-info data
>> instead of using the bw peak value.
[...]
> This might be related to:
>
> Changes in version 0.2.2.15-alpha - 2010-08-18
> - Relays report the number of bytes spent on answering directory
> requests in extra-info descriptors similar to {read,write}-history.
> Implements enhancement 1790.
>
> There are now two new lines "dirreq-read-history ..." and
> "dirreq-write-history ..." containing the bytes spent on the dir
> protocol. Maybe TNS greps for "read-history" and not "^read-history"
> when parsing descriptors?
yes exactly!
And cause the dirreq-history data lines are displayed behind the
ordinary read/write history data, the script summed up the dirreq
bandwidth. Thus blutmagie tns mistakenly displayed the (correct)
directory request bandwidth for all 0.2.2.15 nodes. This is fixed now.
regards Olaf
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo at torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
More information about the tor-talk
mailing list