My tor exit node is STILL gone from the node list

[Timo Schoeler]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

thus Scott Bennett spake:
|      On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:03:10 +0300 "Alexandru Cezar" <tor at ze.ro>
| wrote:
|>> Best of luck getting your provider to straighten out the routing.
|> I have limited experience in running servers. From what I found out,
my Xen dom0 is traceable
|> (89.248.169.106), while the virtual host running TOR is not
(89.248.169.109, vif-bridge). I can
|> still access the web server running on 109 though.
|> Is this a Xen misconfiguration? I can't think of anything that I have
changed.
|>
|      I've never worked with Xen, so I can't answer that.  However, it is
| certainly possible to misconfigure other virtualization environments in
| ways that would probably cause those symptoms.  OTOH, it strikes me as
| more likely that the host system's packet filtering/redirection/NAT
software
| may be misconfigured.  Xen doesn't yet run on the BSDs, AFAIK, so I'll
guess
| that it's running on a LINUX system of some flavor, so iptables is
probably
| the filtering package.  Beyond that, I can't tell you much.  Some of the
| LINUX users on this list ought to be able to give you some help in
figuring
| out whether the problem is with Xen or with the host system.
|
|
|                                   Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG

hi,

a vif-bridge in Xen does, what it's name says: It bridges. So when your
domU has a 'proper' (plain standard seen from within the domU itself) IP
setup, there's no difference to a bare metal host.

However, as I see, your problem's already fixed?

Best,

Timo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFKZWMqfg746kcGBOwRAjMgAKC37tgWTftU17sEoLR47yC23I55AACaAyjf
aKA5vUmSbC8YXFuU+tGpofI=
=7lXw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----