Time Warner bad / VPS recommendations
Xinwen Fu
xinwenfu at gmail.com
Tue Feb 3 15:39:19 UTC 2009
The problem is: was the violation done through Tor? A bot may do the same
thing. Time to scan your computer?:) Maybe you can run Tor as an entry or a
middle node, not an exit node.
Cheers,
Xinwen Fu
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Matthew McCabe <mateo07 at mrmccabe.com>wrote:
> I sent TWC a modified version of the EFF DMCA response letter for the DMCA
> takedown notices. I even personally replied to one of the DMCAs from an
> agent for Paramount. I was only able to personally reply to one of the
> complaints as TWC would not forward me any of the other notices.
>
> The technician from the abuse department said that because my account
> already had 5 complaints, he would disconnect me if I received another. He
> was very clear on that point. He understood that I was running Tor and that
> this traffic was coming from the Tor network. Again, there is nothing in
> the AUP or TOS that stated that I could not run a service like Tor. But it
> does state that violating intellectual property rights and "hacking" are not
> allowed. As I explained previously, 3 of the notices were DMCA notices
> (copyright violations) and 2 were hacking complaints. This tech and TWC
> believe that the user of their service is responsible for any of these
> violations. Thus, it seems that they may try to disconnect my service based
> upon these 5 complaints.
>
> Again, I would rather setup Tor on a VPS if anyone has a recommendation for
> a company and hosting plan!
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
>
>
> Scott Bennett wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:42:01 -0600 Matthew McCabe <
>> mateo07 at mrmccabe.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> So Time Warner Cable finally gave me an ultimatum that either I stop
>>> running Tor or they will shut off my service. This was after 3 DMCA and 2
>>> general abuse/hacking complaints. Note that Time Warner does not say
>>> anything about proxy servers in their AUP. They were just tired of getting
>>> these complaints on my account. Also, AT&T was not able to setup DSL
>>> service at my location...so I have decided to kill my Tor exit node.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Really? When you sent Time-Warner a letter based upon
>>
>> http://www.torproject.org/eff/tor-dmca-response.html.en
>>
>> what was their response? Did you counter with a politely stated promise
>> to file a formal letter of complaint with the FCC against Time-Warner if
>> they disconnect you without justification under your contract with them
>> or under their AUP? You could point out in such a complaint that you had
>> abided by the contract and the AUP and had no recourse to another service
>> (assuming that no other service is indeed available).
>>
>>
>>> I would really like to continue running a Tor exit node. I have looked
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Are you giving up too soon?
>>
>>
>>
>>> at a couple virtual hosting companies such as vpslink and slicehost.
>>> Some of their cheaper plans seem like they would be sufficient for running
>>> a Tor exit node. Does anyone run Tor on a VPS? If so, which company and
>>> plan do you use? Have you gotten any flack for running a Tor exit node?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
>> **********************************************************************
>> * Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu *
>> *--------------------------------------------------------------------*
>> * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good *
>> * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments *
>> * -- a standing army." *
>> * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 *
>> **********************************************************************
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/attachments/20090203/934eb06d/attachment.htm>
More information about the tor-talk
mailing list