[zang meijun]

On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:42 PM, 臧美君 <zangmj at gmail.com> wrote:

> when choosing the middle nodes, it excludes the exit node and other middle
> nodes first.


sorry, i'm saying it excludes the exit node and the other middle nodes first
in the same path

>
> and then exclude itself if it's a or. and randomly choose a node in the
> running routers list which contains all those routers only if it's now
> running and valid and you think it's reliable enough.
> so actually i don't see there's some policy to exlude those exit nodes
>
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Erilenz <erilenz at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If you run as an exit node, it's my understanding that you also act as a
>> middleman node. Would it be possible, and would it be a good idea, to
>> add an option such that you only act as an exit node?
>>
>> It seems a bit of a waste to use potential exit bandwidth as middleman
>> relaying bandwidth when exit bandwdith is more scarce.
>>
>> --
>> Erilenz
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/attachments/20081103/505abc23/attachment.htm>