attachstream via control port, permission denied? [FIXED]
Jon McLachlan
mcla0181 at umn.edu
Fri Jan 18 17:14:10 UTC 2008
Ahh, I have discovered what was causing this issue. The [ip]:[port]
location was a service running on the Exit OR. I believe setting the
configuration variable,
ExitPolicyRejectPrivate 0
fixed the problem reported below.
Best Regards,
~Jon
Jon McLachlan wrote:
> Running, version 0.2.0.16-alpha, I am...
>
> 1) extend one new tunnel, of length 2 through (1st hop) OR w/
> purpose=bridge, (2nd hop) OR w/ purpose=controller
> Note, Tor indicates one built circuit of length 2:
> 250-circuit-status=50 BUILT $[some-hex-value],$[some-other-hex-value]
> 250 OK
>
> 2) connecting to Tor via privoxy with an http request,
> Note, Tor indicates a stream-request (unattached):
> 250-stream-status=27 NEW 0 [some-ip]:[some-port]
> 250 OK
>
> 3) Attempt to manually attach the stream to the circuit by sending
> via the controlPort (I've also noticed that it will not automatically
> attach the stream):
>
> To Tor: ATTACHSTREAM 27 50
> From Tor: 555 Connection is not managed by controller.
>
> From these, it almost seems like because the Tor controller did not
> init the stream, that the attach is rejected. It doesn't seem like
> streams have purposes, but do they? Might I need to set the purpose
> of the new stream to purpose=controller? If this is not the case,
> maybe there is a way that the controller could init a special stream?
>
> As always, any comments or advice would be most valuable and very much
> appreciated :)
>
> Best Regards,
> ~Jon
>
More information about the tor-talk
mailing list