"Our directory information is no longer up-to-date enough to build circuits." problem logged
vikingserver at gmail.com
vikingserver at gmail.com
Wed Nov 7 14:50:01 UTC 2007
BTW, the problem is happening right now, if you want to test something
on my server.
The logging is at info level.
I can resist from restarting Tor, so that you can test the problem "live".
Tell me what to do if you need information.
/Vikingserver
vikingserver at gmail.com skrev:
> I also have reproduced this error with 0209alpha on win32 and have
> logged everything at info level.
>
> Do you want my log? How big files can you receive? The log is 30MB+ and
> I would rather send you the interesting parts rather than the whole log
> file. But how big files can you receive by email?
>
> /Viking
>
> Scott Bennett skrev:
>> On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 07:32:11 -0500 Roger Dingledine <arma at mit.edu> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 12:57:33AM -0600, Scott Bennett wrote:
>>>> This problem has now recurred twice for me with 0.2.0.9-alpha. The first
>>>> time I had forgotten to set the log level to "info", so I didn't get the
>>>> information that Nick wanted. This time, though, I got it. If Nick or Roger
>>>> will let me know a) how much of the log before the first problem message
>>>> appeared they would like to see and how much after and b) where to send it, I
>>>> can send that much of the log as a gzip-ped attachment.
>>> Hi Scott,
>>>
>>> I encountered this issue once with 0.2.0.9-alpha, and it wasn't
>>> immediately apparent what the problem was. Since then we've fixed a
>>> variety of things, including providing more details in the logs about
>>> *why* we don't feel we've got enough dir info.
>> Oh, good. Glad to know that.
>>> So if you could upgrade to svn trunk and see if it recurs there, that
>>> would be great. (And if it does recur, hopefully it will provide a better
>>> hint. :) (If upgrading to svn is too much of a hassle, I'm hoping to
>>> get the 0.2.0.10-alpha snapshot out sometime this week.)
>>>
>> I don't have subversion installed and have never used it, so I think
>> I'll wait for the next snapshot. Will "info" still be the log level needed
>> to get the information you and Nick want? It's awfully verbose, so if the
>> new logging stuff you've added is tied to the message about an out-of-date
>> directory, could it maybe be issued at the "notice" level?
>>
>>
>> Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
>> **********************************************************************
>> * Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu *
>> *--------------------------------------------------------------------*
>> * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good *
>> * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments *
>> * -- a standing army." *
>> * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 *
>> **********************************************************************
>>
>
More information about the tor-talk
mailing list