Testing bridge capabilities

[Andrew Del Vecchio]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

GRC says port is closed but not stealthed. Firestarter shows that I have
a remote connection via tor on port 433, and TCP433 is allowed. What
could still be going wrong here?

Any  help would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Andrew
- --
People just like you lose untold millions in personal wealth due to
frivolous lawsuits and unfair government seizures.
Are you protected? Read the Asset Protection Crash Course at
http://www.keepyourassets.net?andrew to find out how to protect your
hard-earned assets.


F. Fox wrote:
> Andrew Del Vecchio wrote:
>> How do I go about
>> testing my functionality? Also, if I can't use 443, are there other
>> typically not blocked ports that it would be worth using?
> 
> AFAIK, Cox doesn't block port 443 - at least not here. I have "kitsune"
> listening on 443 (via redirect, of course).
> 
> As far as testing ports (assuming all you want to know is if it's
> open)... other than having other users Telnet to you, I've used "Shields
> Up" to see if its listening:
> http://grc.com
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHeHulgwZR2XMkZmQRAjVEAJ9ID/b3GnCuSqHGK7HUOGwrVfdG4ACgpAkN
omjpg1xn81olD/YBX8d4KEU=
=3Q5b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----