A different solution for anonymous browsing !
gabrix
gabrix at gabrix.ath.cx
Sun Nov 19 19:45:17 UTC 2006
Taka Khumbartha wrote:
> gabrix @ 2006/11/16 04:28:
>
> >I invite everyone , who is trying , tryed or is actually applying a
> >chain of proxies for browsing,like manies one after the other , or
> >unusual proxies configurations for anonymous browsing different from
> >the usual tor/privoxy duo,socat,anonweb,polipo,squid,wwwoffle, to let me
> >know .... thanks !
>
> i'm not sure why you are wanting to do this. but, if you are trying
> to be "more anonymous", then this is not the right approach. here's why:
>
> as i have been told (and please correct me if i'm mistaken!),
> basically, every OS-browser-proxy(-et.al.) combination is going to
> leave behind a unique footprint that can be tracked by a skilled
> adversary. the more complicated you make your chain of proxies, the
> more unique footprint it will leave. in this respect it is best to
> stick with a configuration more people use, hence anonymity. good luck.
>
> on the other paw, if you are doing such a thing so you can research
> these unique footprints and compile a database of sorts, please share
> your results! the more we know, the better each application can be
> tuned so as to minimize and converge such unique footprints.
I don't know personally much people using linux and between the people i
know i'm the skillest ... i'm too lazy for reading but i do it anyway
offcourse and i think i can learn more asking experiences around that ,
usually , are not written anywhere . I have to admit i know linux my way
which is not always the proper , people experience is important .
I like proxy servers and all their forms and i'm also curious on tools
like sockat for example and i can read all manuals i want but only
seeing someone using it i can learn the proper way to look at ... it's
just the way i am.
G!
More information about the tor-talk
mailing list