Using Tor signals on Win32 NT (eg. pseudo-signals)?

eric.jung at yahoo.com eric.jung at yahoo.com
Wed Aug 2 23:39:30 UTC 2006


>I know some people are averse to installing .NET and, if that's the case with Anothony, then I doubt there's a viable (free) scripting solution.

I take this back. I forgot you can invoke COM objects from Windows Script Host (WSH) scripts. WSH only requires wscript.exe, not .NET (it predates .NET by a number of years). There are countless COM objects that handle socket communications.

Let me know if you need more info.



----- Original Message ----
From: eric.jung at yahoo.com
To: or-talk at freehaven.net
Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2006 7:06:33 PM
Subject: Re: Re[4]: Using Tor signals on Win32 NT (eg. pseudo-signals)?

I recommended PowerShell for Anothony because he mentioned Windows-specific batch files. Yes, PowerShell requires .NET 2.0, but since he is confined to a Windows machine does that really matter? I know some people are averse to installing .NET and, if that's the case with Anothony, then I doubt there's a viable (free) scripting solution.

I realize Torpark is cross-platform, and that is why I recommended XPCOM for it (and gave you links to learn about socket communications over XPCOM off this list).


----- Original Message ----
From: Arrakistor <arrakistor at gmail.com>
To: Anothony Georgeo <or-talk at freehaven.net>
Sent: Wednesday, August 2,  2006 6:31:58 PM
Subject: Re[4]: Using Tor signals on Win32 NT (eg. pseudo-signals)?

Anothony,

Yes,  XPCOM  will be useful and certainly the solution I need. It just
so  happens  that  I don't know javascript, so the XPCOM solution will
take me a while to figure out.

Regards,
 Arrakistor

Wednesday, August 2, 2006, 5:22:28 PM, you wrote:

> Hi Arrakistor,

> Arrakistor <arrakistor at gmail.com> wrote: Unfortunately, 
> powershell is not any sort of standalone, and requires
> the  entire  .net  framework  be  installed to use it, from what I can
> tell.

> Regards,
>  Arrakistor
> Yes, PowerShell requires .Net 2.0 so unfortunitly it is not
> usefull to your TorPark.  But, as eric mentioned XPCOM may work for
> you?  http://www.mozilla.org/projects/xpcom


         
> ---------------------------------
> Groups are talking. We&acute;re listening. Check out the handy changes to Yahoo! Groups.









-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/attachments/20060802/72af95c5/attachment.htm>


More information about the tor-talk mailing list