Anonymity on mobile devices
Eugen Leitl
eugen at leitl.org
Wed Sep 21 13:24:44 UTC 2005
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 01:33:33AM +0200, Christian Beil wrote:
> We want to protect against an external adversary and against the
> provider snooping.
> And we don't want the destination host to get more information than the
> user wants to provide, of course.
> We are still considering where to locate the gateway, more precisely the
> we leave it open where the gateway is running. Perhaps it is no good
> idea to let the anonymity gateway run on the broadcast gateway of the ISP.
If this is G3/UMTS, lack of flat rate (my plan includes just 10 MByte/month,
with 100 kByte accounting atoms, while an SSH (PuTTY) session to a
mere prompt then ^D eats up ~12 kBytes) kinda renders mobile Tor moot.
What I could see Tor on as a package for OpenWRT or Sveasoft, maybe
even in a mesh configuration.
--
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a>
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.leitl.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/attachments/20050921/f97a5d60/attachment.pgp>
More information about the tor-talk
mailing list