ATTN: for-profit Tor operators

[Chris Palmer]

Anthony DiPierro writes:

> Actually I would say if anything the opposite is true.  By being an
> operator itself, the EFF has standing to be involved in the cases
> themselves, rather than simply providing free legal support to someone
> else.

You don't need standing to be counsel to a defendant.

The rules for standing (in e.g. intervention) are actually pretty
tricky, and simply being or not being a Tor operator is not necessarily
enough:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule24.htm


-- 
http://www.eff.org/about/staff/#chris_palmer

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/attachments/20051128/25de92c6/attachment.pgp>