IRCNet abuse

[Eugen Leitl]

On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 08:42:34PM +0200, Marco Gruss wrote:

> Hibernation is probably what you're looking for. Look for AccountingMax
> and AccountingStart in tor.1.

I'm not sure that nodes just going catatonic periodically is a behaviour to
encourage. Throttling traffic is something more predictable.

I understand the anonymizing services population is bimodal: you've got some
few really stable nodes, and lots of ephemeral ones. While a network should
be able to handle lots of coming and going, the stable nodes are important.

Does Tor make a distinction between stable and ephemeral nodes? (Trust
metric, if not agoric load levelling).

-- 
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a>
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820            http://www.leitl.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/attachments/20050609/a2490b83/attachment.pgp>