From mikeperry at torproject.org Tue Jun 2 21:55:36 2020 From: mikeperry at torproject.org (Mike Perry) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 16:55:36 -0500 Subject: [tor-scaling] Congestion control review + proposal ideas post In-Reply-To: <7c1c08fa-4082-6f4a-0cea-7b5e922b4583@torproject.org> References: <7c1c08fa-4082-6f4a-0cea-7b5e922b4583@torproject.org> Message-ID: <3dbda90b-57c3-2612-d319-1d562669b603@torproject.org> As a heads up, I finally finished the second installment of background review material for this topic: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2020-June/014343.html The next step is Tor Proposal. On 1/30/20 7:57 AM, Mike Perry wrote: > I just posted a very long summary of congestion control attempts in Tor, > in which I also include a handful of potential new ideas: > https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2020-January/014140.html > > That post recaps basically everything we've learned in the past 20 years > of anonymity research on the topic, and then borrows some ideas from TCP > research, to propose new ideas for Tor. I believe several of these ideas > are considerably more secure than drop signaling/QUIC, and some of them > can be deployed by upgrading only Exit nodes. > > I tried to make it accessible to both Tor and external dev audiences. > > I opted for tor-dev because there are likely more old cypherpunks on > that list who can review it, but I wanted to give a heads up here in > case there are people who are only on this list. > > -- > Mike Perry > > _______________________________________________ > tor-scaling mailing list > tor-scaling at lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-scaling > -- Mike Perry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: