[tor-relays] turning off BridgeDB and the future of moat bridges

[lists at for-privacy.net]

On Wednesday, 2 October 2024 17:07 Toralf Förster via tor-relays wrote:
> On 10/2/24 13:03, meskio wrote:
> > Not a concrete one. My plan is to review the situation early next month
> > and
> > depending on the usage bring the conversation on what to do with those
> > bridges to our thursdays Anti-Censorship meetings.
> 
> I plan to change set the bridge distribution for my 4 unassigned moat
> bridges. What methods are currently preferred?

I set all to default=any¹. They will then remain on the current distribution 
method and rdsys will redistribute them when meskio switches.

Actually I have all bridges on default=any except for the one 'lox' of course.

¹A few years ago I set up the first 8 bridges rather haphazardly, *2 per IP*. 
Gus and Nifty then told me that this *wasn't so good*. The rest I only did one 
via IP. Because different distribution methods were assigned at that time, I 
set them for the first 8 bridges. But meskio fixed that:
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/anti-censorship/rdsys/-/issues/106

-- 
╰_╯ Ciao Marco!

Debian GNU/Linux

It's free software and it gives you freedom!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 3872 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20241003/891c2741/attachment.sig>