[tor-relays] recommended way to run 0.4.7 on armhf?

[Georg Koppen]

ilf:
> Thanks. I thought about doing that, but I would rather not like to mix 
> Raspian bullseye and Debian bullseye-backports.
> 
> Is there a good reason against building armhf on deb.torproject.org?

Just resource constraints. We have a ticket for that work[1] but 
de-prioritized it even further given that we have a good workaround and 
a lot of affected users are happy with it.

Patches (still) welcome! :)

Georg

[1] https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor/-/issues/40347

> 
> Georg Koppen:
>> Right. One thing we recommended when talking to relay operators during 
>> earlier EOL upgrade periods is adding the debian -backports repository 
>> to the Raspberry Pi. It worked well according to the feedback we got. 
>> We linked to
>> https://marksrpicluster.blogspot.com/2019/12/add-buster-backports-to-raspberry-pi.html
>> for general steps (you need to adapt them for bullseye, though).
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20220811/b570c32f/attachment.sig>