[tor-relays] New Test for Measuring the Accuracy of Tor Relays' Advertised Bandwidths
Scott Bennett
bennett at sdf.org
Tue May 11 06:38:37 UTC 2021
Georg Koppen <gk at torproject.org> wrote:
> Some of you might remember the speed test Rob had been running during
> August 2019 to investigate the accuracy of the advertised bandwidth a
> relay is reporting in its server descriptor.[1] Back then this involved,
> for each relay, downloading several large data streams for a period of
> about 20 seconds to get a better estimation of the relay's true capacity
> (See: [1] and follow-up emails for the exact details of the experiment).
>
> We plan to do this speed test again in about 1 week and relay operators
> can opt-out of it (again) if they want to. We still believe that the
> overhead of this speed test is in line with regular usage, but if anyone
> doesn't want to participate that's fine. Let us know if so (by replying
> to this thread or off-list, if preferred) and we remove your relay(s)
> from the list to scan.
>
> Thanks,
> Georg
>
> [1]
> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2019-July/017535.htmlff.
>
Okay, I read that, but I do not see where you offer any method to
account for other traffic that the relay being tested may be dealing with
at the time you are testing it. IOW, your testing procedure would be fine
if only the tor network, or at least each relay while it were being tested,
were entirely idle w.r.t. the traffic of other users. This is the same
defect that the authorities' testing procedures suffer from.
Do you have a solution to offer?
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**********************************************************************
* Internet: bennett at sdf.org *xor* bennett at freeshell.org *
*--------------------------------------------------------------------*
* "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good *
* objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments *
* -- a standing army." *
* -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 *
**********************************************************************
More information about the tor-relays
mailing list