[tor-relays] Dropped off consensus (0.4.4.5) - reason is Libressl 3.2.1

[Felix]

Hi everybody

> Sep 18 21:00:22.384 [notice] Tor 0.4.4.5 running on FreeBSD with
> Libevent 2.1.12-stable, OpenSSL LibreSSL 3.2.1, Zlib 1.2.11, Liblzma
> 5.2.4, and Libzstd 1.4.5.
> moria1 Fast       Run   Stab V2Dir Valid bw=566
> tor26  Fast Guard       Stab V2Dir Valid
> dizum  Fast Guard       Stab V2Dir Valid
> gabel. Fast             Stab V2Dir Valid bw=1130
> danne. Fast Guard Run     Stab V2Dir Valid
> maatu. Fast              Stab V2Dir Valid bw=1200
> farav. Fast Guard Run     Stab V2Dir Valid bw=2970
> longc. Fast              Stab V2Dir Valid bw=490
> bastet Fast Guard Run   Stab V2Dir Valid bw=3520

2 hours after Libressl 321 -> 320
Sep 20 10:30:45.633 [notice] Tor 0.4.4.5 running on FreeBSD with
Libevent 2.1.12-stable, OpenSSL LibreSSL 3.2.0, Zlib 1.2.11, Liblzma
5.2.4, and Libzstd 1.4.5.
moria1 Fast        Run Stab V2Dir Valid bw=566
tor26  Fast        Run Stab V2Dir Valid
dizum  Fast        Run Stab V2Dir Valid
gabel. Fast        Run Stab V2Dir Valid bw=1130
danne. Fast -Guard Run Stab V2Dir Valid
maatu. Fast        Run Stab V2Dir Valid bw=1200
farav. Fast -Guard Run Stab V2Dir Valid bw=2970
longc. !Fast       Run Stab V2Dir Valid bw=70
bastet Fast -Guard Run Stab V2Dir Valid bw=3520
OWNER :: bwauth=gabelmoo

> (Yeah, some Lib stuff is new too, hehe)
Libressl 321 is not compatible to what is needed to make the authorities
tor26, dizum, gabel., maatu. and longc. happy (let them not grant a
"Running"). What can that be?

Please somebody can _confirm_ this thing?

PS: We had the same trouble with Libressl 292 when 28x worked well and
30x too.

PPS: Is that a good reason to stay away from automated updates? Ok,
Libressl 321 is -devel ....

--
Cheers, Felix