[tor-relays] BridgeDB currently up but non-functional?
Philipp Winter
phw at torproject.org
Wed Jun 26 16:58:46 UTC 2019
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 05:56:21AM -0700, Rick Huebner wrote:
> Hi, Phillip. Thanks for the response, and for taking on these issues. I also
> sent a more detailed direct report to frontdesk at torproject.org. It
> apparently crossed with your reply to this thread in the mail, I wasn't
> intending to nag. I assume that'll end up forwarded to you as well,
> hopefully the extra detail I was able to include there will be helpful in
> debugging the problems.
Thanks for your help, Rick. I did see your frontdesk email.
Here's a quick update on the issue:
1. I blacklisted 53 bridges whose obfs4 port was unreachable:
<https://gitweb.torproject.org/project/bridges/bridgedb-admin.git/commit/?id=5a8fe00304aee3df49ebbcbeb16ae3854bda0556>
After deploying <https://bugs.torproject.org/28655>, these bridges
were effectively useless. Hopefully, this will reduce the odds of
getting a non-functional obfs4 bridge.
2. I added a log message to BridgeDB that tells us how many bridge
requests resulted in 0, 1, 2, and 3 bridge lines. Here are the
results for a few hours worth of logs:
# of bridges | # of requests
-------------+--------------
0 | 188 (14%)
1 | 381 (29%)
2 | 395 (38%)
3 | 235 (18%)
(Interestingly, all requests that resulted in 0 bridges were HTTPS
requests for obfs2, coming from Tor exit relays. BridgeDB no longer
supports obfs2, which is why it responds with 0 bridges.)
Assuming that these numbers are correct, BridgeDB should be returning
at least one bridge for every request it has seen over the last few
hours. That clearly wasn't the case a few days ago but I wonder if
it's the case now. Are you still unable to get bridges from BridgeDB?
Cheers,
Philipp
More information about the tor-relays
mailing list