[tor-relays] 3 questions

[niftybunny]

> On 29. Aug 2019, at 05:52, teor <teor at riseup.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 29 Aug 2019, at 00:07, niftybunny <abuse-contact at to-surf-and-protect.net <mailto:abuse-contact at to-surf-and-protect.net>> wrote:
>> 
>> 2. Whats up with Torflow, still linked from Tor Atlas. As far as I can see it was last updated over 3,5 years ago?
> 
> It is still running on 4/6 bandwidth authorities.

My bad. I meant https://torflow.uncharted.software <https://torflow.uncharted.software/> linked from https://metrics.torproject.org/uncharted-data-flow.html <https://metrics.torproject.org/uncharted-data-flow.html>.

> After we fix some critical bugs in sbws, we will replace torflow with sbws.
> 
> Maybe metrics could also link to sbws from Relay Search?
> 
>> 3. So what happened to the new measurement? I can see a big spike https://metrics.torproject.org/bandwidth.html <https://metrics.torproject.org/bandwidth.html> and now its back to normal? Same with a lot of my relays, traffic doubled/tripled and now its the same or worse.
> 
> It didn't have any permanent impact. I'm not too surprised.

Does this mean we have enough bw for the users and its “only” a distribution problem?

> 
> We probably need to change the bandwidth authorities, or tor, to have a
> permanent impact.
> 
> sbws will be easier to change than torflow.
> 
> T
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20190829/78dea6c6/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20190829/78dea6c6/attachment.sig>