[tor-relays] FreeBSD 11.1 ZFS Tor Image

niftybunny abuse at to-surf-and-protect.net
Mon Feb 26 19:01:27 UTC 2018


No multihoming = no AS. I do not pay for things I do not really need.

https://nusenu.github.io/OrNetStats/asnameshare <https://nusenu.github.io/OrNetStats/asnameshare>

0	OVH SAS	15.76	22.92	7.34	499
1	Online S.a.s.	9.6	10.1	10.59	372
2	Hetzner Online GmbH	6.37	8.89	1.93	273
3	DigitalOcean, LLC	4.47	5.79	2.3	280

My relays are #4. OVH is 4 times bigger than me...


Markus


> On 26. Feb 2018, at 19:06, Paul <pa011 at web.de> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> Yes, of course. However, you refer to the lack of diversity in operating
>> systems, but monocultures in providers/ASNs is another danger we should
>> be conscious of.
>> 
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> https://torbsd.org/oostats/relays-bw-by-asn.txt
> 
> These calculation don’t show the situation as it currently really is - unfortunately:
> 
> About 32 out of these https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#search/nifty relays seem not to get counted in ASN nor in cw-fraction (probably because as in this example https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/609E598FB6A00BCF7872906B602B705B64541C50  AS Name and AS Number are unknown).
> 
> But they are about 15% of total Exit https://github.com/nusenu/OrNetStats/blob/master/allexitfamilies.md - that seems kind of monocultures?
> 
> Paul
> <0xC8C330E7.asc>_______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20180226/5c2c8c03/attachment.html>


More information about the tor-relays mailing list