[tor-relays] Feedback wanted: letter to my university's library
Kenneth Freeman
kencf0618 at riseup.net
Thu Oct 5 05:17:21 UTC 2017
On 10/03/2017 11:31 PM, Scott Bennett wrote:
> They have refused to let me speak with those making the decisions about
> what is provided on their public computers, much less to make an organized
> presentation to them. I was told that the decisions about software on the
> computers are made by the library board, not even by the IT staff. What is
> a good approach to get better results? I am at a loss as to how to get the
> library to emerge from the stone age into the age of the Cheka, much less
> that of the NSA, FSB, search engine profilers, botnets, packet sniffers,
> spyware, etc.
One might think that providing the Tor browser would be a no-brainer,
but that's not the case in the Boise Public Library system. The
bureaucratic inertia is a very real thing, so good luck getting them to
install relays and exits too! First things first.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0xDD79757F.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 3129 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20171004/02f16070/attachment.key>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20171004/02f16070/attachment.sig>
More information about the tor-relays
mailing list