[tor-relays] Caching new entry debian-tor...

[Tristan]

Well, until someone decides to update Orbot, Android users are still on
0.2.7.5.

On Sep 21, 2016 8:30 AM, "teor" <teor2345 at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> > On 21 Sep 2016, at 22:46, Tristan <supersluether at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Well, according to this question I asked on Tor's StackExchange, version
> 0.2.4.26 is still technically in the recommended consensus.
>
> And it will be the next to go, likely when the next directory authority's
> details change, or a serious security issue is discovered.
>
> > At any rate, running an older version is better for diversity, isn't it?
>
> Sort of, but the accumulated security fixes and performance improvements
> in later versions tend to outweigh the benefit of running a really old
> version. You'd actually contribute more to Tor's diversity by running
> 0.2.6, and even 0.2.7 isn't the most common version any more.
>
> Tim
>
> >
> >
> > On Sep 21, 2016 2:13 AM, "shraptor" <shraptor at bahnhof.se> wrote:
> > On 2016-09-20 20:58, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 07:20:03PM +0200, shraptor wrote:
> > What's up with these messages I get in tor-arm and log?
> >
> > Caching new entry debian-tor for debian-tor [62 duplicates hidden]
> >
> > What is tor doing??
> >
> > Sep 20 19:10:21.000 [notice] Caching new entry debian-tor for debian-tor
> >
> > It looks like this notice-level entry was changed to an info-level entry
> > starting in Tor 0.2.7.1-alpha:
> >
> > ...
> >
> >
> > So it looks like you are running an old version of Tor? You should
> > upgrade and the line should go away. In any case it should be harmless.
> >
> >
> > Yeah well I'm running on rpi3 and it says in tor-arm that 0.2.5 is the
> recommended
> > version for this architecture.
> >
> > Anyway I checked out your public repo's of armhf compiled tor packages.
> > These packages are unfortunately dependent on libsystemd that is not
> welcome on my systems.
> > I am running devuan as OS.
> >
> > So I have looked into building a newer version myself but it is a bit
> of  jungle
> > to setup the tool chain for me.
> >
> >
> > I hadn't noticed this log-message before and had some trouble with my
> relay so felt the need to seek information.
> >
> > /scooby
> > _______________________________________________
> > tor-relays mailing list
> > tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> > _______________________________________________
> > tor-relays mailing list
> > tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
> Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)
>
> teor2345 at gmail dot com
> PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
> ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
> xmpp: teor at torproject dot org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20160921/411cb470/attachment-0001.html>