[tor-relays] Caching new entry debian-tor...

[Tristan]

Whoops, forgot to paste the link:
https://tor.stackexchange.com/questions/12638/how-old-is-too-old-tor-versions

On Sep 21, 2016 7:46 AM, "Tristan" <supersluether at gmail.com> wrote:

> Well, according to this question I asked on Tor's StackExchange, version
> 0.2.4.26 is still technically in the recommended consensus.
>
> At any rate, running an older version is better for diversity, isn't it?
>
> On Sep 21, 2016 2:13 AM, "shraptor" <shraptor at bahnhof.se> wrote:
>
>> On 2016-09-20 20:58, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 07:20:03PM +0200, shraptor wrote:
>>>
>>>> What's up with these messages I get in tor-arm and log?
>>>>
>>>> Caching new entry debian-tor for debian-tor [62 duplicates hidden]
>>>>
>>>> What is tor doing??
>>>>
>>>> Sep 20 19:10:21.000 [notice] Caching new entry debian-tor for debian-tor
>>>>
>>>
>>> It looks like this notice-level entry was changed to an info-level entry
>>> starting in Tor 0.2.7.1-alpha:
>>>
>>
>> ...
>>
>>
>>> So it looks like you are running an old version of Tor? You should
>>> upgrade and the line should go away. In any case it should be harmless.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Yeah well I'm running on rpi3 and it says in tor-arm that 0.2.5 is the
>> recommended
>> version for this architecture.
>>
>> Anyway I checked out your public repo's of armhf compiled tor packages.
>> These packages are unfortunately dependent on libsystemd that is not
>> welcome on my systems.
>> I am running devuan as OS.
>>
>> So I have looked into building a newer version myself but it is a bit of
>> jungle
>> to setup the tool chain for me.
>>
>>
>> I hadn't noticed this log-message before and had some trouble with my
>> relay so felt the need to seek information.
>>
>> /scooby
>> _______________________________________________
>> tor-relays mailing list
>> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20160921/7605adc0/attachment.html>