[tor-relays] is it possible to relay using ipv6?
root
tor at afo-tm.org
Sun Nov 27 19:41:51 UTC 2016
I can't find any ISP in the Consensus that doesn't have IPv6 and more
than 0,1% Consensus Weight, also one Relay at a FTTH ISP that offer 200+
MBit/s symmetric and only public IPv6 would gain more Consensus Weight
than all Relays we would have lost due to that change together.
On 27.11.2016 19:06, Tristan wrote:
>
> If that happens, many people won't be able to run a middle relay at
> home. Nobody in my neighborhood has an IPV6 address, and none of the
> WiFi spots in town have one either.
>
> IPV6 just isn't used wisely enough. If any change happens, it should
> be *can* have just IPV6, and *can* have IPV4.
>
>
> On Nov 27, 2016 11:59 AM, "root" <tor at afo-tm.org
> <mailto:tor at afo-tm.org>> wrote:
>
> It is end 2016 we should change from must have IPv4 to must have
> IPv6 and can have IPv4. All this new fancy ISPs that have FTTH and
> give you 500 MBit/s symmetric internet access have Carrier grade
> NAT because they were late to the Party and don't get IPv4 from
> the LIRs.
> You can't run there a relay because of the stupid you need a
> public accessible IPv4 address shit. So i see there a big gain in
> making that change, because then the guys with the big home pipes
> can run relays too. On the other hand datacenters that have only
> IPv4 are very uncommon, so there would be no big loss of relays.
> Clients that are IPv4 only can use Dual-Stack relays so they won't
> have a problem.
>
>
> On 26.11.2016 11:26, teor wrote:
>
> On 26 Nov. 2016, at 21:14, Lluís <2015.msl at gmail.com
> <mailto:2015.msl at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> If I didn't understand right, a relay can use IPv6 but it
> will **not**
> bootstrap unless it is assigned an IPv4 address.
>
> Does that summarize the discussion ?
>
> Yes.
>
> A relay *must* have an IPv4 address to publish a descriptor.
> A relay can also publish an IPv6 address it its descriptor.
>
> Tim
>
> Cheers
> Lluís
>
>
> teor:
>
> On 23 Nov. 2016, at 02:54, Ralph Seichter
> <tor-relays-ml at horus-it.de
> <mailto:tor-relays-ml at horus-it.de>> wrote:
>
> On 22.11.16 03:33, teor wrote:
>
> ...
> ClientPreferIPv6DirPort 1
>
> This option was introduced and deprecated in
> the 0.2.8 alpha series,
> it has no effect.
>
> That's unexpected.
> https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-manual.html.en
> <https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-manual.html.en>
> still lists this option. I went through this
> manual page for anything
> IPv6-related I could find.
>
> Here is the ticket to deprecate that option:
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/19704
> <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/19704>
>
> It's just waiting for someone to write the code and
> change the manual.
>
> T
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> <mailto:tor-relays at lists.torproject.org>
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>
>
> T
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> <mailto:tor-relays at lists.torproject.org>
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
More information about the tor-relays
mailing list