[tor-relays] Questions on traffic differences between two Exit relays in two different locations
Petrusko
petrusko at riseup.net
Thu Jun 2 19:43:29 UTC 2016
Hey,
Have you checked the Atlas + Globe websites ? Using your 2 server's
fingerprints.
https://atlas.torproject.org/
https://globe.torproject.org/
On Atlas, you will find "Consensus Weight" with a number for your exit 1
and exit 2.
The higher the number is, the higher the server will be used on the Tor
network.
You will be able compare your 2 servers seen by authorities easily.
Hope this helps a little ;)
Le 02/06/2016 à 21:20, pa011 a écrit :
> I would like to understand the working of two exit relays, one is about
> 7 days old -the other worked as a middle relay before and is an exit now
> for about two weeks. The second one has a higher potential connection up
> to 250 Mbit/s while the first is supposed to be limited on 100 Mbit/s.
> They both run (Linux 3.16.0-4...), Tor 0.2.7.6, both use half or less
> of their CPU and Memory.
>
> So why does the second node in a different city in Eastern Europe not
> attract more traffic compared to the first one and thereby uses its full
> capacity, even when the second one is longer in the market?
>
> Could please somebody explain or send me some links to read ?
> Does this depend on the location of the node and in which way?
>
>
> Node 1:
>
> day rx | tx | total | avg. rate
> ------------------------+-------------+-------------+---------------
> 26.05.2016 594,06 MiB | 121,20 MiB | 715,27 MiB | 67,82 kbit/s
> 27.05.2016 30,22 GiB | 30,20 GiB | 60,42 GiB | 5,87 Mbit/s
> 28.05.2016 188,73 GiB | 191,03 GiB | 379,76 GiB | 36,87 Mbit/s
> 29.05.2016 216,98 GiB | 220,23 GiB | 437,21 GiB | 42,45 Mbit/s
> 30.05.2016 280,10 GiB | 285,21 GiB | 565,31 GiB | 54,89 Mbit/s
> 31.05.2016 334,17 GiB | 338,36 GiB | 672,53 GiB | 65,30 Mbit/s
> 01.06.2016 678,74 GiB | 691,32 GiB | 1,34 TiB | 133,02 Mbit/s
> 02.06.2016 714,88 GiB | 726,10 GiB | 1,41 TiB |
>
>
> Node2:
>
>
>
> day rx | tx | total | avg. rate
> ------------------------+-------------+-------------+---------------
> 05/12/16 24.68 GiB | 25.66 GiB | 50.34 GiB | 4.89 Mbit/s
> 05/13/16 64.18 GiB | 66.27 GiB | 130.45 GiB | 12.67 Mbit/s
> 05/14/16 68.34 GiB | 70.30 GiB | 138.63 GiB | 13.46 Mbit/s
> 05/15/16 66.34 GiB | 68.00 GiB | 134.34 GiB | 13.04 Mbit/s
> 05/16/16 72.87 GiB | 74.51 GiB | 147.38 GiB | 14.31 Mbit/s
> 05/17/16 73.32 GiB | 74.74 GiB | 148.06 GiB | 14.38 Mbit/s
> 05/18/16 81.14 GiB | 82.17 GiB | 163.30 GiB | 15.86 Mbit/s
> 05/19/16 72.22 GiB | 74.33 GiB | 146.55 GiB | 14.23 Mbit/s
> 05/20/16 74.62 GiB | 76.93 GiB | 151.55 GiB | 14.71 Mbit/s
> 05/21/16 96.44 GiB | 98.68 GiB | 195.12 GiB | 18.94 Mbit/s
> 05/22/16 227.48 GiB | 225.03 GiB | 452.50 GiB | 43.93 Mbit/s
> 05/23/16 216.46 GiB | 214.71 GiB | 431.17 GiB | 41.86 Mbit/s
> 05/24/16 231.87 GiB | 227.53 GiB | 459.41 GiB | 44.60 Mbit/s
> 05/25/16 302.77 GiB | 298.03 GiB | 600.80 GiB | 58.33 Mbit/s
> 05/26/16 280.37 GiB | 273.64 GiB | 554.01 GiB | 53.79 Mbit/s
> 05/27/16 318.75 GiB | 312.23 GiB | 630.98 GiB | 61.26 Mbit/s
> 05/28/16 317.57 GiB | 311.64 GiB | 629.21 GiB | 61.09 Mbit/s
> 05/29/16 271.41 GiB | 267.75 GiB | 539.16 GiB | 52.35 Mbit/s
> 05/30/16 290.85 GiB | 284.82 GiB | 575.67 GiB | 55.89 Mbit/s
> 05/31/16 323.61 GiB | 313.39 GiB | 637.00 GiB | 61.85 Mbit/s
> 06/01/16 279.34 GiB | 276.31 GiB | 555.65 GiB | 53.95 Mbit/s
> 06/02/16 259.17 GiB | 256.20 GiB | 515.38 GiB |
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
--
Petrusko
PubKey EBE23AE5
C0BF 2184 4A77 4A18 90E9 F72C B3CA E665 EBE2 3AE5
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20160602/e3c165cf/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the tor-relays
mailing list